From: Rahul Chakma (rchakma1@angelfire. com) Subject: Rohingya Muslim Infiltration into Myanmar Newsgroups: soc.culture. indian,soc. culture.banglade sh, soc.culture. burma, soc.culture. malaysia, soc.culture. indonesia Date: 2001-11-23 14:17:16 PST
"Kill them wherever you find them, and drive them out from whence they drove you out, and persecution is severer than slaughter, and do not fight with them at the Sacred Mosque until they fight with you in it, but if they do fight you, then slay them; such is the recompense of the unbelievers. " [Quran 2.191]
Bangladesh shares about 300 Km border with Myanmar. Since 1947, the successive Pakistani and Bangladeshi governments have been sponsoring the Bengali Muslims to infiltrate into Rakhaing state of Myanmar to alter the demographic profile if favour of the Muslims. So called Rohingya Muslims are nothing but illegal infiltrators from Bangladesh, they have no ancestral and historical root in Myanmar.
The infiltration is part of the Islamic expansionism. In the Muslim viewpoint, the world is divided into two regions- those areascontrolled by Islam, called Dar al-Islam (meaning the House of Islam) and those called Dar al-Harb (the House of War). Islam commands Muslims to infiltrate into the non-Muslim countries, outbreed and fight non-Muslims until they exterminate all non-Muslims, leaving Islam as the one and only religion of the land (Sura 8:39). Muhammad is quoted in the Hadith as saying, I have been ordered to fight with the people until they say, none has the right to be worshiped but Allah. (Hadith 4:196).
The Rohingya Muslims are twisting the history (as Muslims always do). With the help of Bangladeshi intelligence and middle eastern finance, they formed an armed group called ARNO (Arakan Rohingya National Organisation) to "liberate" Rakhaing state from Myanmar and establish an Islamic state. This group is armed, trained and harboured by the Bangladesh army and intelligence. The Rohingya Muslims are a classic example of trans-national terrorism. The international Jihadis fight alongside Rohingyas against Myanmar military, the Rohingya fighters in turn help their co-religionists in Kashmir, Afghanistan, Chechnya, Kosovo etc.
The Rohingya Muslims are involved in human rights violations against the indigenous Rakhaing population of Myanmar. They abduct and rape Rakhine girls, murder men and disposses the Rakhaings of their land. I urge the Amnesty International and UNHCR to see the Rohingya Muslim problem objectively and not fall into the baseless Rohingya Muslim propaganda.
Rahul Chakma (A non-Muslim in Bangladesh) Bangladeshi terrorism: "http://www.angelfir e.com/ab/ jumma"
More than 3 million Muslim devotees from 52 countries gathered along the banks of the Turag river, 30 kilometers north of Dhaka in Bangladesh at Tongi, Gazipur, for the three-day annual Biswa Ijtema (World Congregation) between December 14 and 16. The significance of the event was underlined by the profile of political leaders who attended: present at the concluding prayers were Bangladesh President Iajuddin Ahmed; the Prime Minister, Begum Khaleda Zia; the leader of the opposition in parliament, Sheikh Hasina, and other political, civil and military leaders. The Ijtema is organized annually by the Tablighi Jamaat.
The Biswa Ijtema, the second largest congregation of Muslims in the world after the Hajj, ended peacefully despite rumors that some international terrorist groups may have planned to disrupt the event. But the fact that millions of Muslim devotees from across the world gathered in Bangladesh emphasizes the role that the country has come to play in the context of international Islamic brotherhood. Although the government in Dhaka has reacted fiercely to any suggestion that the country is becoming a haven for Islamic extremists, reports from Asian and Western intelligence services suggest otherwise.
Shortly after the fall of Kandahar in late 2001, several hundred Taliban and al-Qaeda fighters escaped by ship from Karachi to Chittagong. They were then trucked down to hidden camps in the Ukhia area, south of Cox's Bazaar. Local people report seeing heavily armed men, with a few Bangladeshis among them, in those camps. They were told that they would be killed if anyone told "outsiders" about this regrouping of ex-Afghanistan fighters in this remote corner of southeastern Bangladesh.
According to other reports from Asian security services, militants from the Jemaah Islamiah - which is connected to al-Qaeda and wants to set up a gigantic Islamic state encompassing Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia and southern Philippines - are also hiding out in these camps, which were set up in the early 1990s to train rebels from the Muslim Rohingya minority in Myanmar's Rakhine State. In more recent years, these camps have in effect been run by Bangladesh's most extreme Islamic outfit, the Harkat-ul-Jihad- i-Islami (HuJI), which was set up in 1992, reportedly with financial support from Osama bin Laden.
The Jemaah Islamiah is suspected of being behind a number of planned - but foiled - attacks against Western targets in Singapore, as well as the devastating bomb blast on the Indonesian island of Bali on October 12, in which nearly 200 people were killed, most of them Western tourists.
The Jemaah Islamiah militants in hiding in southeastern Bangladesh are believed to be mostly Malaysian and Singaporean citizens. It is, however, uncertain to what extent the Bangladeshi security services have been involved in their relocation. But well-placed local sources say that it would have been impossible without at least some tacit agreement with the Directorate General of Forces Intelligence (DGFI), Bangladesh's chief intelligence agency, which is closely connected with Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI).
Security concerns heightened over the holding of the Biswa Ijtema in Tongi only a week after at least 18 persons were killed and 300 injured in bomb blasts in four cinema halls in the central Bangladeshi town of Mymensingh on December 7. Without being specific, Prime Minister Khaleda Zia described these as a "planned terrorist attack", while opposition leader Sheikh Hasina of the Awami League claimed that an "identified fanatic terrorist group within [the ruling] alliance is behind these heinous bomb blasts". The international news agency Reuters first reported that Home Minister Altaf Hossain Chowdhury had said that bin Laden's al-Qaeda network was behind the blast, but later had to retract the report after denials from the minister.
Subsequently, the police raided the local office of Reuters in Dhaka. Dozens of opposition activists were also arrested, but no link to them could be established. The raid on Reuters and the arrest of opposition politicians came only days after a British TV team and their local helpers had been arrested for trying to document the rise of Islamic fundamentalism in Bangladesh and its possible consequences on the country's non-Muslim minorities.
Many foreign observers may contend that the Bangladeshi authorities are simply overreacting to international press coverage, but it could also be that the DGFI has too much to hide, and therefore wants to silence any reports suggesting that their country has become a hot-bed of Islamic fundamentalism.
The four-party alliance that won the Bangladeshi elections in October 2001 includes the fundamentalist Jamaat-e-Islami, which has two ministers in the present government. Its youth organization, the Islami Chhatra Shibir (ICS), was behind Bangladesh's most devastating bomb blast before the cinemas in Mymensingh were hit - an explosion on June 15, 2001, at the Awami League office in Narayanganj, in which 21 persons were killed and over 100 others injured. The same government-connecte d outfit is also suspected of being behind several other bomb blasts as well as attacks on secular Bangladeshi politicians, journalists and writers.
The ICS is closely connected with the most militant of the Rohingya organizations along the Myanmar-Bangladesh border, the Rohingya Solidarity Organization (RSO), which also has links to the al-Qaeda. Video footage released by the American cable television network CNN in August this year and obtained from al-Qaeda shows Rohingyas as well as Bangladeshis training in camps near the country's southeastern border, but well inside Bangladesh.
Al-Qaeda's involvement in Bangladesh was confirmed in September this year when the police in Dhaka arrested seven "aid workers" working for the Saudi-based Al Haramain Islamic Institute. The men, who came from Libya, Algeria, Sudan and Yemen, belonged to an organization that had first come to Bangladesh to help Rohingya refugees, but later became involved in running Islamic centers all over the country. The so-called institute has been named by several sources as a front for al-Qaeda. Perhaps not surprisingly, nothing came out of the arrests and the whole affair was quickly hushed up by the Bangladeshi authorities, suggesting that the "arrests" were a mistake by some local police officer.
The United States has so far accepted the Bangladeshi government's assurances that the country is not playing host to international terrorist movements, and that it is a reliable partner in the global war on terror. But this ostrich-like mentality may change as more evidence to the contrary comes to light. The arrests of foreign journalists and the raid on Reuters in Dhaka are worrying signs of increasing intolerance in Bangladesh. And the hosting of the Biswa Ijtema is bound to attract the attention of "friendly" Islamic organizations, which see the country as a perfect place to hide out when international attention is focused on events in more high-profile countries such as Pakistan and Indonesia.
Bertil Lintner, senior writer, Far Eastern Economic Review.
Published with permission from the South http://www.atimes. com/atimes/ South_Asia/ DL21Df01. html
By Bertil Lintner
Introduction
When East Pakistan broke away from the main Western part of the country to form Bangladesh in 1971, it was in opposition to the notion that all Muslim areas of former British India should unite in one state. The Awami League, which led the struggle for independence, grew out of the Bangla language movement, and was based on Bengali nationalism, not religion. At the same time, independent, secular Bangladesh became the only country in the subcontinent with one dominant language group and very few ethnic and religious minorities.
It is important to remember that a Muslim element has always been present; otherwise what was East Pakistan could have merged with the predominantly Hindu Indian state of West Bengal, where the same language is spoken. The importance of Islam grew as the Awami League fell out with the country's powerful military, which began to use religion as a counterweight to the League's secular, vaguely socialist policies (many hardline socialists, however, were opposed to the idea of a separate Bengali state in Bangladesh, which they branded as "bourgeois nationalism. ")
The late Bangladeshi scholar Muhammad Ghulam Kabir argued that Maj.-Gen. Zia ur-Rahman, who seized power in the mid-1970s, "successfully changed the image of Bangladesh from a liberal Muslim country to an Islamic country."1 M.G. Kabir also points out that "secularism" is a hazy and often misunderstood concept in Bangladesh. The Bengali term for it is dharma mirapekshata, which literally translates to "religious neutrality." Thus the word "secularism" in a Bangladeshi context has a subtle difference in meaning from its use in the West.2
In 1977, Zia dropped secularism as one of the four cornerstones of Bangladesh's constitution (the other three were democracy, nationalism, and socialism, although no socialist economic system was ever introduced) and made the recitation of verses from the Qur'an a regular practice as meetings with his newly-formed political organization, the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP), which became the second biggest party in the country after the Awami League. The marriage of convenience between the military — which needed popular appeal and an ideological platform to justify its opposition to the Awami League — and the country's Islamic forces survived Zia's assassination in 1981.
In some respects, it grew even stronger under the rule of Lt.-Gen. Hossain Muhammad Ershad (1982-90). In 1988, Ershad made Islam the state religion of Bangladesh, thus institutionalizing the new brand of nationalism with an Islamic flavor introduced by Zia. Ershad also changed the weekly holiday from Sunday to Friday, and revived the Jamaat-e-Islami to counter secular opposition.
The Jamaat had supported Pakistan against the Bengali nationalists during the liberation war, and most of its leaders had fled to (West) Pakistan after 1971. Under Zia, they came back and brought with them new, fundamentalist ideas. Under Ershad, Islam became a political factor to be reckoned with.
Ershad was deposed in December 1990 following anti-government protests, and was later convicted of a number of offences and jailed. But this did not lead to a return to old secular practices.
Zia's widow and the new leader of the BNP, Khaleda Zia, became prime minister after a general election in February 1991. This was a time when the Islamic forces consolidated their influence in Bangladesh, but it came to a halt when the Awami Legaue, led by Sheikh Hasina Wajed, the daughter of Bangladesh's founding father, Sheikh Mujib ur-Rahman, won the 1996 election. Five years later, an electoral 4-party alliance led by Khaleda Zia's BNP came to power — and the new coalition that took over included for the first time two ministers from the Jamaat, which had emerged as the third largest party, capturing 17 seats in the 300-strong parliament.
The BNP rode on a wave of dissatisfaction with the Awami League, which many perceived as corrupt, but the the 4-party alliance was able to win a massive majority — 191 seats for the BNP and 23 seats for its three allies — only because of the British-style system with one winner per constituency, and the alliance members all voted for each other. The Awami League remains the single biggest political party in Bangladesh with 40% of the popular vote, but it secured only 62 seats
www.asiapacificms. com
1
(or 20.66% of the MPs) in the election (it now has 58 seats because four were relinquished due to election of MPs from more than one seat).3
Expectations were high on the new government, which many hoped would be "cleaner" than the previous one. In June 2001, the Berlin-based organization Transparency International had in its annual report ranked Bangladesh the world's most corrupt country.4 But since the new government took over in October 2001, very little has changed in that regard. Further, violence has become widespread and much of it appears to be religiously and politically motivated. The Society for Environment and Human Development (SEHD), a well-respected Bangladeshi NGO, quotes a local report that says that non-Muslim minorities have suffered as a result: "The intimidation of the minorities which had begun before the election, became worse afterwards." 5 Amnesty International reported in December 2001 that Hindus — who now make up less than 10% of Bangladesh's population of 130 million — in particular have come under attack. Hindu places of worship have been ransacked, villages destroyed and scores of Hindu women are reported to have been raped.6
While the Jamaat may not be directly behind these attacks, its inclusion in the government has meant that more radical groups feel they now enjoy protection from the authorities and can act with impunity. The most militant group, the Harkat-ul-Jihad- al-Islami (HUJI, or the Movement of Islamic Holy War), is reported to have 15,000 members. Bangladeshi Hindus and moderate
Muslims hold them responsible for many of the recent attacks against religious minorities, secular intellectuals and journalists. In a statement released by the US State Department on May 21, 2002, HUJI is described as a terrorist organization with ties to Islamic militants in Pakistan.7 While Bangladesh is yet far from becoming another Pakistan, Islamic forces are no doubt on the rise, and extremist influence is growing, especially in the countryside. According to a foreign diplomat in Dhaka: "In the 1960s and 1970s, it was the leftists who were seen as incorruptible purists. Today, the role model for many young men in rural areas is the dedicated Islamic cleric with his skull cap, flowing robes and beard."8
The Return of the Jamaat-e-Islami
The idea that the Muslim-dominated parts of British India should become a separate country was articulated for the first time in a short essay written in 1933 by an Indian Muslim student at Cambridge, Rahmat Ali. He even proposed a name for the new state — Pakistan — which was an acronym based on the nations that would compose it: the Punjab, Afghan (the Northwest Frontier), Kashmir, Indus (or Sindh) and BaluchiSTAN. The new name also meant "the Land of the Pure."
However, the acronym did not include India's most populous Muslim province, East Bengal, and, at first, most Islamic groups opposed the idea of religious nationalism. The most prestigious Islamic university in the subcontinent, the Darul Uloom, was located at Deoband in Saharanpur district of what now is Uttar Pradesh in India, and its leaders strongly supported the Indian nationalist movement led by the Congress. The Jamaat-e-Islami, which was founded in 1941 by Maulana Abul Ala Mauddudi and had grown out of the Deoband Madrassa (as the university became known) went to the extent of "alleging that the demand for a separate state based on modern selfish nationalism amounted to rebelling against the tenets of Islam."9
But gradually, the Muslim League, led by Muhammad Ali Jinnah, won support for the Pakistan idea, and when India became independent in August 1947, two states were born: the secular but Hindu-dominated Union of India — and the Islamic state of Pakistan, which consisted of two parts, one to the west of India and the other to the east. The Jamaat became one of the strongest supporters of the Pakistan idea, and, somewhat ironically, the Deobandi movement through its network of religious schools, or madrassas, developed into a breeding ground for Pakistan-centered Islamic fundamentalism. Over the years, the Deobandi brand of Islam has become almost synonymous with religious extremism and fanaticism.
The Deobandis had actually arisen in British India not as a reactionary force but as a forwardlooking movement to unite and reform Muslim society in the wake of oppression the community faced after the 1857 revolt, or "Mutiny" as the British called it.10 But in independent Pakistan — East and West — new Deobandi madrassas were set up everywhere, and they were run by semieducated mullahs who, according to Pakistani journalist Ahmed Rashid, "were far removed from the original reformist agenda of the Deobandi school."11 Much later, it was from these madrassas Afghanistan' s dreaded Talibans ("Islamic Students") were to emerge.
The Jamaat was from the beginning inspired by the Ikhwan ul-Muslimeen, or the Muslim Brotherhood, which was set up in Egypt in 1928 with the aim of bringing about an Islamic revo
www.asiapacificms. com
2
lution and creating an Islamic state.12 When they had come to accept Pakistan as that Islamic state, Bengali nationalism was totally unacceptable. The Jamaat's militants fought alongside the Pakistan army against the Bengali nationalists. Among the most notorious of the Jamaat leaders was Abdul Kader Molla, who became known as "the Butcher of Mirpur," a Dhaka suburb which in 1971 was populated mainly by non-Bengali Muslim immigrants.13 Today, he is the publicity secretary of Bangladeshi Jamaat, and, despite his background, was granted a US visa to visit New York in the last week of June, 2002. In 1971, he and other Jamaat leaders were considered war criminals by the first government of independent Bangladesh, but they were never prosecuted as they had fled to Pakistan.
The leaders of the Jamaat returned to Bangladesh during the rule of Zia and Ershad because they were invited to come back, and they also saw Ershad especially as a champion of their cause. This was somewhat ironic as Ershad was — and still is — known as a playboy and hardly a religiously- minded person. But he had introduced a string of Islamic reforms — and he needed the Jamaatto counter the Awami League, and, like his predecessor Zia, he had to find ideological underpinnings for what was basically a military dictatorship. The problem was that the Jamaat had been discredited by its role in the liberation war — but, as a new generation emerged, that could be "corrected." Jamaat's Islamic ideals were taught in Bangladesh's madrassas, which multiplied at a tremendous pace.
The madrassas fill an important function in an impoverished country such as Bangladesh, where basic education is available only to a few. Today, there are an estimated 64,000 madrassas in Bangladesh, divided into two kinds. The Aliya madrassas are run with government support and control, while the Dars-e-Nizami or Deoband-style madrassas are totally independent. Aliya students study for 15-16 years and are taught Arabic, religious theory and other Islamic subjects as well as English, mathematics, science and history. They prepare themselves for employment in government service, or for jobs in the private sector like any other college or university student. In 1999, there were 7,122 such registered madrassas in Bangladesh.14 The much more numerous Deobandi madrassas are more "traditional" ; Islamic studies dominate, and the students are taught Urdu (the national language of Pakistan), Persian and Arabic. After finishing their education, the students are incapable of taking up any mainstream profession, and the mosques and the madrassas are their main sources of employment. As Bangladeshi journalist Salahuddin Babar points out: "Passing out from the madrassas, poorly equipped to enter mainstream life and professions, the students are easily lured by motivated quarters who capitalize on religious sentiment to crate fanatics, rather than modern Muslims."15
The consequences of this kind of madrassa education can be seen in the growth of the Jamaat. It did not fare well in the 1996 election, capturing only three seats in the parliament and 8.61% of the votes.16 Its election manifesto was also quite carefully worded, perhaps taking into consideration the party's reputation and the fact that the vast majority of Bangladeshis remain opposed to Sharia law and other extreme Islamic practices. The 23-page document devoted 18 pages to lofty election promises, and only five to explaining Jamaat's political stand. The party tried to reassure the public that it would not advocate chopping off thieves' hands, stoning of people committing adultery, or banning interest — at least not immediately. According to the NGO SEHD: "The priority focus would be alleviation of poverty, stopping free mixing of sexes and thus awakening the people to the spirit of Islam and then eventually step by step the Islamic laws would be introduced." 17
It is impossible to determine how much support the Jamaat actually had in the 2001 election as it was part of an alliance whose various members voted for each other against the Awami League, but its 17 seats in the new parliament — and two ministers in the government — suggest a dramatic increase. Its youth organization, Islami Chhatra Shibir (ICS), is especially active. It is a member of the International Islamic Federation of Student Organizations as well as the World Assembly of Muslim Youth and has close contacts with other radical Muslim groups in Pakistan, the Middle East, Malaysia and Indonesia. One of its main strongholds is at the university in Chittagong, and it dominates the Deobandi madrassas all over the country, from where it draws most of its new members. It has been implicated in a number of bombings and politically and religiously motivated assassinations.
On April 7, 2001, two leaders of the Awami League's youth and student front were killed by ICS activists and on June 15, an estimated 21 people were killed and over 100 injured in a bomb blast at the Awami League party office in the town of Narayanganj. Two weeks later, the police arrested an ICS activist for his alleged involvement in the blast.18 A youngish Islamic militant, Nurul Islam Bulbul, is the ICS's current president, and Muhammad Nazrul Islam its general secretary.
www.asiapacificms. com
3
For many years the mother party, the Jamaat, was led by Gholam Azam, who had returned from Pakistan when Zia was still alive and in power. He resigned in December 2000, and Motiur Rahman Nizami took over as the new amir of the party amid wide protests and demands that he be put on trial for war crimes he committed during the liberation war as the head of a notorious paramilitary force, the Al-Badar. In one particular incident on December 3, 1971, some members of that force seized the village of Bishalikkha at night in search of freedom fighters, beating many and killing eight people. When Nizami's appointment was made public, veterans of the liberation war burnt an effigy of him during a public rally.19 In October 2001, Nizami was appointed minister for agriculture, an important post in a mainly agricultural country such as Bangladesh. His deputy, Ali Ahsan Muhammad Mujahid, became minister for social welfare.
The terrorist attacks in New York on September 11, 2001, occurred during the election campaign in Bangladesh, when the country was ruled by a caretaker government. But the outgoing prime minister, the Awami League's Sheikh Hasina, and then opposition leader Khaleda Zia of the BNP, condemned the attacks and both, if they were elected, offered the United States use of Bangladesh's air space, ports and other facilities to launch military attacks against the Taliban and Al-Qaeda in Afghanstan. Many Bangladeshis were moved by the loss of as many as 50 of their countrymen in the attacks on the World Trade Center. While some of them were immigrants working as computer analysts and engineers, most seem to have been waiters at the Window on the World restaurant who were working hard to send money back to poor relatives in Bangladesh. A Bangladeshi embassy official in Washington branded the attacks "an affront to Islam…an attack on humanity."20
Jamaat's stand on the "war against terrorism," however, contrasts sharply to that of the more established parties. Shortly after the US attacks on Afghanistan began in October 2001, the Jamaat created a fund purportedly for "helping the innocent victims of America's war." According to the Jamaat's own announcements, 12 million Bangladeshi taka ($210,000) was raised before the effort was discontinued in March 2002. Any remaining funds, the Jamaat then said, would go to Afghan refugees in camps in Pakistan.21
The Rise of the Harkat-ul-Jihad- al-Islami (HUJI) and Other Extremist Groups
The growth of the Jamaat during the Ershad regime paved the way for the establishment of even more radical groups when the BNP returned to power in 1991. According to Bangladeshi journalists, in the early 1990s Bangladeshi diplomats in Saudi-Arabia issued passports to Pakistani militants in the kingdom to enable them to escape to Bangladesh.22 Other extremists from Pakistan — and perhaps also Afghanistan — appear to have been able to enter Bangladesh in the same way during that period.
These men were instrumental in building up HUJI, which was first formed in 1992, reportedly with funds from Osama bin Laden.23 The existence of firm links between the new Bangladeshi militants and Al-Qaeda was proven when Fazlul Rahman, leader of the "Jihad Movement in Bangladesh" (to which HUJI belongs), signed the official declaration of "holy war" against the United States on February 23, 1998. Other signatories included bin Laden, Ayman al-Zawahiri (leader of the Jihad Group in Egypt), Rifa'i Ahmad Taha aka Abu-Yasir (Egyptian Islamic Group), and Sheikh Mir Hamzah (secretary of the Jamiat-ul-Ulema- e-Pakistan) .24 HUJI is headed by Shawkat Osman aka Maulana or Sheikh Farid in Chittagong and, according to the US State Department, has "at least six camps" in Bangladesh.25 Like the ICS it draws most of its members from the country's Deobandi madrassas, and, also like the ICS, the group has shown that it is capable of extreme violence. Bangladesh's Islamic radicals first came to international attention in 1993, when author Taslima Nasrin was forced to flee the country after receiving death threats. The fundamentalists objected to her critical writings about what she termed outdated religious beliefs. Extremist groups offered a $5,000 reward for her death. She now lives in exile in France.
While Nasrin's outspoken, feminist writings caused controversy even among moderate Bangladeshi Muslims, the entire state was shocked when, in early 1999, three men attempted to kill Shams ur-Rahman, a well-known poet and a symbol of Bangladesh's secular nationhood. During the ensuing arrests, the police said they seized a list of several intellectuals and writers, including Nasrin, whom Bangladeshi religious extremists branded "enemies of Islam."26 Bangladeshi human rights organizations openly accuse HUJI of being behind both the death threats against Nasrin and the attempt to kill Rahman. The US State Department notes that HUJI
www.asiapacificms. com
4
has been accused of stabbing a senior Bangladeshi journalist in November 2000 for making a documentary on the plight of Hindus in Bangladesh, and the July 2000 assassination attempt of then prime minister Sheikh Hasina.27
As with the Jamaat and the ICS, HUJI's main stronghold is in the lawless southeast, which includes the border with Burma. With its fluid population and weak law enforcement, the region has long been a haven for smugglers, gun runners, pirates, and ethnic insurgents from across theBurmese border. The past decade has seen a massive influx of weapons, especially small arms,through the fishing port of Cox's Bazaar, which has made the situation in the southeast even more dangerous and volatile.28 Typically, the winner in the 2001 election in one of the constituencies in Cox's Bazaar, BNP candidate Shahjahan Chowdhury, was said to be supported by "the man allegedly leading smuggling operations in [the border town of] Teknaf." Instead of the regular army, the paramilitary Bangladesh Rifles was deployed in this constituency to help the police in their electoral peacekeeping. This was, according to the NGO SEHD, "criticised by the local people who alleged that the Bangladesh Rifles were well connected with the smuggling activities and thus could take partisan roles." 29
In one of the most recent high-profile attacks in the area, Gopal Krishna Muhuri, the 60-year-old principal of Nazirhat College in Chittagong and a leading secular humanist, was gunned down in November 2001 in his home by four hired assassins, who belonged to a gang patronized by the Jamaat.30 India, which is viewing the growth of Bangladesh's Islamic movements with deep concern, has linked HUJI militants to the attack on the American Center in Kolkata (Calcutta) in January 2002, and a series of bomb blasts in the state of Assam in mid-1999. 31
On May 10-11, 2002, nine Islamic fundamentalist groups, including HUJI, met at a camp near the small town of Ukhia south of Cox's Bazaar and formed the Bangladesh Islamic Manch (Association) . The new umbrella organization also includes one purporting to represent the Rohingyas, a Muslim minority in Burma, and the Muslim Liberation Tigers of Assam, a small group operating in India's northeast. By June, Bangladeshi veterans of the anti-Soviet war in Afghanistan in the 1980s were reported to be training members of the new alliance in at least two camps in southern Bangladesh.32
The Plight of the Royhingyas
The Arakan area of Burma was separated from the rest of the country by a densely forested mountain range, which made it possible for the Arakanese — most of whom are Buddhist — to maintain their independence until the late 18 th century. Contacts with the outside world had until then been mostly to the west, which, in turn, had brought Islam to the region. The first Muslims on the Arakan coast were Moorish, Arab and Persian traders who arrived between the 9 th and the 15 th centuries. Some of them stayed and married local women. Their offspring became the forefathers of yet another hybrid race, which much later was to become known as the Rohingyas. Like the people in the Chittagong area, they speak a Bengali dialect interspersed with words borrowed from Persian, Urdu and Arakanese.33
There is no evidence of friction between them and their Buddhist neighbors in the earlier days. Indeed, after 1430 the Arakanese kings, though Buddhists, even used Muslim titles in addition to their own names and issued medallions bearing the kalima, or Muslim confession of faith.34 Persian was the court language until the Burmese invasion in 1784. Burmese rule lasted until the first Anglo-Burmese war of 1824-26, when Arakan was taken over by the British along with the Tenasserim region of southeastern Burma.
When Burma was a part of British India, the rich ricelands of Arakan attracted thousands of seasonal laborers, especially from the Chittagong area of adjacent East Bengal. Many of them found it convenient to stay since there was already a large Muslim population who spoke the same language, and, at that time, no ill feeling towards immigrants from India proper — unlike the situation in other parts of Burma, where people of subcontinental origin were despised. At the same time, Buddhist Arakanese migrated to East Bengal and settled along the coast between Chittagong and Cox's Bazaar. The official border, the Naf river, united rather than separated the two British territories.
But the presence of a Muslim minority in Arakan became an issue after Burma's independence in 1948. The Buddhist and Muslim communities had become divided during World War Two; the Buddhists had rallied behind the Japanese while the Muslims had remained loyal to the British. Some Muslims, fearing reprisals from the Buddhists once the British were gone, rose up in arms,
www.asiapacificms. com
5
demanding an independent state, and the Burmese army was sent in to quell the rebellion. Predominantly Buddhist Burma never really recognized the Arakanese Muslims — who in the 1960s began to refer to themselves as "Rohingya," a term of disputed origin — as one of the country's "indigenous" ethnic groups. As such, and because of their different religion and physical appearance, they have often become convenient scapegoats for Burma's military government to rally the public against whenever that country has been hit by an economic or political crisis. In March 1978, the Burmese government launched a campaign code-named Naga Min (Dragon King) in Arakan, ostensibly to "check illegal immigrants." Hundreds of heavily armed troops raided Muslim neighborhoods in Sittwe (Akyab) and some 5,000 people were arrested. As the operation was extended to other parts of Arakan, tens of thousands of Rohingyas crossed the border to Bangladesh. By the end of June, an approximately 200,000 Rohingyas had fled, causing an international outcry.35 Eventually, most of the refugees were allowed to return, but thousands found it safer to remain on the Bangladesh side of the border. Entire communities of "illegal immigrants" from Burma sprung up along the border south of Cox's Bazaar, and a steady trickle of refugees from Burma continued to cross into Bangladesh throughout the 1980s.
The immensely wealthy Saudi-Arabian charity Rabitat al Alam al Islami began sending aid to the Rohingya refugees during the 1978 crisis, and it also built a hospital and a madrassa at Ukhia south of Cox's Bazaar. Prior to these events, there was only one political organization among the Rohingyas on the Bangladesh-Burma border, the Rohingya Patriotic Front (RPF), which was set up in 1974 by Muhammad Jafar Habib, a native of Buthidaung in Arakan and a graduate of RangoonUniversity. He made several appeals — most of them unsuccessful — to the international Islamic community for help, and maintained a camp for his small guerrilla army, which operated from the Bangladeshi side of the border. In the early 1980s, more radical elements among the Rohingyas broke away from the RPF to set up the Rohingya Solidarity Organization (RSO). Led by a medical doctor from Arakan, Muhammad Yunus, it soon became the main and most militant faction among the Rohingyas in Bangladesh and on the border. Given its more rigid religious stand, the RSO soon enjoyed support from like-minded groups in the Muslim world. These included Jamaat-e-Islami in Bangladesh and Pakistan, Gulbuddin Hekmatyar's Hizb-e-Islami in Afghanistan, Hizbe-ul Mujahideen in Kashmir and
Angkatan Belia Islam sa-Malaysia (ABIM), the Islamic Youth Organization of Malaysia. Afghan instructors were seen in some of the RSO camps along the Bangladesh-Burma border, while nearly 100 RSO rebels were reported to be undergoing training in the Afghan province of Khost with Hizb-e-Islami Mujahideen.36 The RSO's main military camp was located near the hospital that the Rabitat had built at Ukhia.
At the time, the RSO acquired a substantial number of Chinese-made RPG-2 rocket launchers, light machine-guns, AK-47 assault rifles, claymore mines and explosives from private arms dealers in the Thai town of Aranyaprathet near Thailand's border with Cambodia, which in the 1980s emerged as a major arms bazaar for guerrilla movements in the region. These weapons were siphoned off from Chinese arms shipments to the resistance battling the Vietnamese army in Cambodia, and sold to any one who wanted, and could afford, to buy them.37
The Bangladeshi media gave quite extensive coverage to the RSO buildup along the border, but it soon became clear that it was not only Rohingyas who underwent training in its camps. Many, it turned out, were members of ICS and came from the University of Chittagong, where a "campus war" was being fought between Islamic militants and more moderate student groups.38 The RSO was, in fact, engaged in little or no fighting inside Burma.
There was also a more moderate faction among the Rohingyas in Bangladesh, the Arakan Rohingya Islamic Front (ARIF), which was set up in 1986, uniting the remnants of the old RPF and a handful of defectors from the RSO. It was led by Nurul Islam, a Rangoon-educated lawyer. But it never had more than a few dozen soldiers, mostly equipped with elderly, UK-made 9mm Sterling L2A3 sub-machine guns, bolt action .303 rifles and a few M-16 assault rifles.39 In 1998, it became the Arakan Rohingya National Organization (ARNO), maintaining its moderate stance and barely surviving in exile in Chittagong and Cox's Bazaar.
The expansion of the RSO in the late 1980s and early 1990s, and the unprecedented publicity the group attracted in the local and international media, prompted the Burmese government to launch a massive counter-offensive to "clear up" the border area. In December 1991, Burmese troops crossed the border and attacked a Bangladeshi military outpost. The incident developed into a major crisis in Bangladesh-Burma relations, and by April 1992 more than 250,000 Rohingya civilians had been forced out of Arakan.
www.asiapacificms. com
6
Hardly by coincidence, this second massive exodus of Rohingyas occurred at a time when Burma was engulfed in a major political crisis. The pro-democracy National League for Democracy (NLD) had won a landslide victory in a general election in May 1990, but the country's military government refused to convene the elected assembly. There were anti-government demonstrations in the northern city of Mandalay, and the ruling Burmese junta was condemned internationally.
The Rohingya refugees were housed in a string of makeshift camps south of Cox's Bazaar, prompting the Bangladeshi government to appeal for help from the international community. The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, UNHCR, came in to run the camps and to negotiate with the Burmese government for the return of the Rohingyas. In April 1992, prince Khaled Sultan Abdul Aziz, commander of the Saudi contingent in the 1991 Gulf War, visited Dhaka and recommended a Desert Storm-like action against Burma, "just what [the UN] did to liberate Kuwait."40 That, of course, did never happen, and the Burmese government, under pressure from the United Narions, eventually agreed to take most of the refugees back. But an estimated 20,000 destitute refugees remain in two camps between Cox's Bazaar and the border. In addition, an undisclosed number of Rohingyas, perhaps as many as 100,000-150, 000, continue to live outside the UNHCRsupervised camps. There is little doubt that extremist groups have taken advantage of the disenfranchised Rohingyas, including recruiting them as cannon fodder for Al-Qaeda in Afghanistan and elsewhere. In an interview with the Karachi-based newspaper, Ummat on September 28, 2001, bin Laden said: "There are areas in all parts of the world where strong jihadi forces are present, from Bosnia to Sudan, and from Burma to Kashmir."41 He was most probably referring to a small group of Rohingyas on the Bangladesh-Burma border. Many of the Rohingya recruits were given the most dangerous task in the battlefield, clearing mines and portering. According to Asian intelligence sources, Rohingya recruits were paid 30,000 Bangladeshi taka ($525) on joining and then 10,000 ($175) per month. The families of recruits killed in action were offered 100,000 taka ($1,750).42 Recruits were taken mostly via Nepal to Pakistan, where they were trained and send on to military camps in Afghanistan. It is not known how many people from this part of Bangladesh — Rohingyas and others — fought in Afghanistan, but it is believed to be quite substantial. Others went to Kashmir and even Chechnya to join forces with Islamic militants there.43
In an interview with the CNN in December 2001, American "taliban" fighter, John Walker Lindh, relate that the Al-Qaeda-directed ansar (companions of the Prophet) brigades, to which he had belonged in Afghanistan, were divided along linguistic lines: "Bengali, Pakistani (Urdu) and Arabic," which suggests that the Bengali-speaking component — Bangladeshi and Rohingya — must have been significant. 44 In early 2002, Afghanistan' s foreign minister, Dr. Abdullah, told a
Western journalist that "we have captured one Malaysian and one or two supporters from Burma."45 In January 2001, Bangladesh clamped down on Rohingya activists and offices in Chittagong and Cox's Bazaar, most probably in an attempt to improve relations with Burma. Hundreds were rounded up, and the local press was full of reports of their alleged involvement in gun- and drugrunning.
Rohingya leaders vehemently deny such accusations, and blame local Bangladeshi gangs with high-level connections for the violence in the area. But the Rohingyas were forced to evacuate their military camps, which had always been located on the Bangladesh side of the border. Recent reports from the area suggest that HUJI and other Bangladeshi Islamic groups have taken over these camps, with the main base being the one the RSO used to maintain near the Rabitatbuilt hospital in Ukhia.46
Attacks on Secular Muslims and Religious Minorities
What now is Bangladesh — and initially East Bengal and then East Pakistan — has undergone some dramatic demographic changes during the past sixty years. According to the 1941 Census of India, Hindus made up 28% of the population of then East Bengal. Twenty years later, when East Pakistan was well-established, the number had decreased to 18.5%. More left during the liberation war in 1971, when the Pakistani army targeted Hindus especially. By 1974, only 13.5% of the population of independent Bangladesh was Hindu. According to the latest estimate, the figure is now down to 9%.47 At the same time, large numbers of Buddhists from the Chittagong Hill Tracts — Bangladesh's other main religious minority — have fled to India.
The fall of the Awami League and the murder of Mujib-ur Rahman in August 1975, followed by the military takeover by Maj.-Gen. Zia in November of that year, ushered in a new era of
www.asiapacificms. com
7
Bangladeshi nationalism, where the religious and ethnic minorities had little or no place. Mujib's immediate successor, Khondkar Mushtaq Ahmed, who was a senior member of the Awami League but known for his Islamic and pro-Pakistan leanings, began to conclude his speeches with Bangladesh Zindabad (long live Bangladesh, but "zindabad" is a Persian word) rather than the war cry of the liberation struggle, Joi Bangla (both words being Bengali). This soon became common practice in government announcements and radio broadcasts. A shift in foreign policy was also noticeable. Bangladesh's first government had emphasized friendship with India and the Soviet Union. Zia's government steered Bangladesh closer to Pakistan, China and Saudi-Arabia. 48 Pakistan's intelligence agency, the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) became active in Bangladesh again, working closely with its local counterpart, the Directorate General of Forces Intelligence (DGFI). Pakistan never fully recovered from the loss of East Pakistan, and never forgave India for the role it played in the birth of Bangladesh by sending troops to fight the Pakistani army.
The idea of Bangladesh rejoining Pakistan was out of the question after the extremely bloody liberation war, in which millions died. But Pakistan was determined to regain its influence over its former eastern part and, especially, to keep Indian influence there at an absolute minimum. Zia's policies, including allowing the Jamaat to return, served these interests, and the Pakistanis, quite naturally, emphasized the main bond that united the two countries: Islam. Historian M.G. Kabir argues that Zia's propagation of a new brand of Bangladeshi nationalism was a scheme "to simultaneously consolidate feelings of nationhood, provide a series of symbols for unifying the country, contribute to the enthusiasm with which nation-building activities are pursued, and, ultimately maintain the identity and integrity of Bangladesh as a nation-state independent of India."49 In a posthumously published article written by Zia, he lists seven factors
which he considers to be the bases of Bangladeshi nationalism: territory, people irrespective of religion, Bengali language, culture, economic life, religion, and the legacy of the 1971 liberation war.50 There is an obvious contradiction between "people irrespective of religion" and "religion," and that has since then been the dilemma for Bangladesh's non-Muslim population. Ershad's declaration of Islam as the state religion made it clear that "religion" in a Bangladeshi context means Islam.
Bangladesh's Islamic identity has strengthened over the years, and after the October 2001 electionthere has been a marked increase in the number of attacks on non-Muslim population groups. These attacks appear to have been prompted by a desire to build a real "nation state," free from minorities, as well as motivated by political revenge. Amnesty International reported in December 2001: "Hindus in Bangladesh have tended to vote for the Awami League. They have therefore been the target of a political backlash by supporters of parties opposing Awami League." In Ziodhara, one of the worst affected villages, several hundred Hindu villagers left the area. In another village, Deuatala Bazaar, gangs of young men wielding sharp weapons reportedly went from door to door telling Hindus to "go away." 51 In Chandaikona Bazaar another youth gang damaged Hindu statues and looted the temple.52
The Amnesty report continues: "Human rights organizations in Bangladesh believe over 100 women have been subjected to rape. Reports persistently allege that the perpetrators have been manly members of the BNP and its coalition partner Jamaat-e-Islami. "53 As a result, thousands of Bangladeshi Hindus have fled to India, often leaving their belongings and land behind. The exact number of refugees is uncertain, as they tend to blend in with the largely Hindu population of the Indian states of West Bengal, Assam and Tripura.
Other religious minorities have also been targeted. In December 2001, a Bangladeshi newspaper reported that young women from 50 Christian families in Natoore were living in fear of hoodlums who would roar past their huts on motorcycles at night. The hoodlums demanded ransom of 10,000-20,000 Bangladeshi taka ($175-350) from men in the village — or their daughters. The villagers had also had their crops taken away after the October election.54 In April 2002 a well-known
Buddhist monk, Ganojyoti Mohasthobir, was murdered by a group of thugs who demanded he paid them "infidel protection tax."55 But also moderate Muslims have become victims. On November 22, 2001 prominent journalist and writer Shahriar Kabir, was arrested at Dhaka international airport on his return from Kolkata.
He had been to India to cover the plight of the Hindus who had fled persecution in Bangladesh, and had his video tapes, film and camera confiscated by the police at the airport. He was held in custody for 19 days before he was released on bail. In March 2002 two staff members of the NGO Proshika ("a Center for Human Development" ), Omar Tarek Chawdhury and Ajhar-ul Hoque, were
www.asiapacificms. com
8
arrested on allegations that they had been in possession of "documents" relating to attacks against Hindus.56 Their arrest came only weeks after the Danish and German ambassadors in Dhaka had asked the Bangladesh government to "take immediate steps to stop all sorts of repression and attacks on the country's religious and other minorities." 57 But there are no signs that this is about to happen. On the contrary, the future for the country's religious and ethnic minorities appears bleak as "Bangladeshi nationalism" is becoming synonymous with a stronger Muslim identity — and Islamic groups are becoming increasingly fierce in their public statements and actions.
Conclusion
In December 2001, Maulana Ubaidul Haq, the khatib (cleric) of Bangladesh's national mosque, Baitul Mukarram, and a Jamaat associate, publicly condemned the US war on terror and urged followers to wage a holy war against the USA. "President Bush and America is the most heinous terrorist in the world. Both America and Bush must be destroyed. The Americans will be washed away if Bangladesh's 120 million Muslims spit on them," the cleric told a gathering of hundreds of thousands of Bangladeshi Muslims which included several high-ranking officials in the new government that took over in October 2001. 58
Despite the virulent rhetoric, it is highly unlikely that Bangladesh's 120 million Muslims would spit on the Americans, or wage a holy war against anybody. Bangaldesh's secular roots are holding, at least for the time being. But the country's Islamic extremists are becoming more vocal and daring in their attacks on "infidels," a worrying sign in what is basically a very tolerant society. And it is not the number of extremists that matters — even a small group can spread fear and terror
— but how well-organized and dedicated they are.
Bangladesh's Islamic extremists are becoming better organized, as the May meeting at Ukhia of nine militant groups shows. The proliferation of small arms, and an ensuing increase in violence of all kinds especially in that part of the country, is also a growing concern. It prompted the country's donors, which met in Paris in March 2002, to tag aid to an improvement in the law and order situation. In mid-2001, the estimated number of illegal arms in Bangladesh was 250,000 of which only 5,481 were recovered during a crackdown in the lead-up to the general election in October 2001 .59 In early 2002, three leading local human rights groups in Bangladesh reported that a total of 258 people were murdered in March alone of which 39 were political killings. In the month of February, the number of murders was 336, including a journalist, according to Bangladeshi NGO the Institute of Democratic Watch.60
A culture of violence, especially among the young, is emerging, and many young Islamic militants now are armed. The role of the madrassas in shaping the next generation of Bangladeshis also cannot be underestimated. By including the Jamaat in her cabinet, Khaleda Zia is playing with fire. On the other hand, Bangladesh remains heavily dependent on foreign aid, and cannot afford to antagonize its most important donor countries, mainly Japan and the West. It should, therefore, bein the government's interest to contain the spread of Islamic extremism. But so far, very little has been done to counter the propaganda and activities of the extremists, and Khaleda Zia has publicly — and angrily — stated in response to the inclusion of two Jamaat ministers in her cabinet that "there are no talibans in my government." 61 By contrast, even in the streets of Dhaka, activists of the Jamaat, ICS and HUJI used to proudly identify themselves as "Bangladeshi talibans," although they stopped usung that label, at least in public, following the September 11, 2001 attacks in New York and Washington.
Some Western diplomats in Dhaka also tend to downplay the extremist threat, viewing local militant Islamic movements as rather insignificant fringe groups. During a breakfast meeting in May 2002 in Washington sponsored by the US-Bangladesh Advisory Council, Mary Ann Peters, the ambassador of the United States to Bangladesh, rejected reports of a growing extremist threat. She termed a report in the April 2, 2002 issue of the Wall Street Journal as "an example of lack of understanding on the part of journalists covering the country's political and social structure." She went on to criticize a similar story in the April 4, 2002 issue of the Far Eastern Economic Review, and called the reporter "lazy" for not working hard enough on the subject and for his failure to give any "clue" in the article that might help make further investigations. She also asserted thatmedia reports about violence against the Hindu community were "exaggerations of facts on the ground." The US embassy in Dhaka had sent its officers to verify the media reports, and that in allcases it was found that the actual situation was less worrisome than what they appeared to be, she said.62
www.asiapacificms. com
9
It is uncertain whether the US ambassador's statements were motivated by a desire to be overly diplomatic, or if they were based on poor intelligence. But such denials will only exacerbate what undoubtedly is a growing problem. It is also important to emphasize that the rise of religious extremism and intolerance in Bangladesh is not just a side effect of military politics. According to Enayetullah Khan, editor of the Bangladesh weekly Holiday, the issue reflects the struggle of a
young and fragile nation to find a national identity: "We're having a bit of an identity crisis here. Are we Bengalis first and Muslims second, or Muslims first and Bengalis second? This is the problem. And when Muslim identity becomes an Islamic identity we're in real trouble."63
As Indonesia — another country that until recently was considered a moderate Muslim state — has shown, an economic collapse or political crisis can give rise to militants for whom religious fanaticism equals national pride; and a way out of misrule, disorder and corrupt worldly politics.
Endnotes
1 Muhammad Ghulam Kabir, Changing Face of Nationalism: The Case of Bangladesh, New
Delhi: South Asian Publishers, 1994, p. 201.
2 Ibid., p. 189.
3 The Eighth Parliamentary Elections 2001, Dhaka: Society for Environment and Human
Development for Coordinating Council for Human Rights in Bangladesh, March 2002, p. 2.
4 http://www.transpar ency.org/ cpi/2001/ cpi2001.html 5 The Eighth Parliamentary Elections 2001, Dhaka: Society for Environment and Human
Development for Coordinating Council for Human Rights in Bangladesh, March 2002, p. 161.
6 Bangladesh: Attacks on members of the Hindu majority, Amnesty International, December
2001.
7 Patterns of Global Terrorism 2001, the Office of the Coordinator for Counterterrorism, May
21, 2002.
8 Bertil Lintner, "Is religious extremism on the rise in Bangladesh?" , Jane's Intelligence
Review, May 2002.
9 M.G . Kabir, op. cit., p. 99.
10 For an excellent account of the rise of the Deobandis, see Salahuddin Babar, "Rise of the
Right", Probe Newsmagazine (Bangladesh) , March 1-15, 2002.
11 Ahmed Rashid, Taliban: The Story of the Afghan Warlords, London: Pan Books, 2001, p. 89.
12 Ibid., p. 86.
13 Ahmed Salim, "Murders Most Foul," Newsline (Pakistan), November 29, 2000.
14 Probe, March 1-15, 2002.
15 Ibid.
16 The Reporter's Guide: Handbook on Election Reporting, Dhaka: Society for Environment and
Human Development, 2001, p. 101.
17 Ibid., p. 101.
18 "Bangladesh Assessment 2002", Southasia Terrorism Portal, an Indian website, 2001.
www.satp.org
19 Bangladesh Broadcasting Service, December 8, 2000.
20 http://usinfo. state.gov/ topical/pol/ terror/01100321. htm 21 Holiday (Bangladesh) , March 8, 2002.
22 Communication with a Bangladeshi journalist who has requested anonymity, April 2002.
23 Southasia Terrorism Portal.
24 See ERRI Daily Intelligence report, ERRI Risk Assessment Service, June 11, 1998, Vo,. 4 –
162. The full text of the 1998 fatwah is also available on http://www.ict. org.il/articles/ fatwah. htm and http://www.fas. org/irp/world/ para/docs/ 980223-fatwa. htm 25 Patterns of Global Terrorism 2001.
26 Türkkaya Ataöv, Kashmir and Neighbours: Tale, Terror, Truce, Aldershot (UK): Ashgate
Publishing, 2001, p. 150.
27 Patterns of Global Terrorism, 2001.
28 Small Arms Survey 2001: Profiling the Problem, Oxford: Oxford University Press (and Small
Arms Survey, Geneva), 2001, p. 181.
29 The Eighth Parliamentary Elections 2001, p. 99.
30 Amnesty International, December 2001.
31 The Hindu, January 23, 2002. See also Subir Bhaumik, The Second Front of Islamic Terror in
South Asia, paper presented at an international seminar on terrorism and low intensity conwww.
asiapacificms. com
10
flict, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, March 6-8, 2002.
32 Far Eastern Economic Review, July 11, 2002.
33 For a comprehensive account of the Rohingyas and other Muslim communities in Burma,
see Moshe Yegar, The Muslims of Burma: A Study of a Minority Group, Wiesbaden: Otto
Harrassowitz, 1972.
34 Ibid., p. 19.
35 For an account of the 1978 refugee crisis, see Bertil Lintner, Burma in Revolt: Opium and
Insurgency Since 1948, Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books, 1999, pp. 317-8.
36 Bertil Lintner, "Tension Mounts in Arakan State," Jane's Defence Weekly, October 19, 1991.
The story was based on interview with Rohingyas and others in the Cox's Bazaar area in
1991. I also visited a Rohingya army camp near the border with Burma.
37 Ibid.
38 Interviews and observations I made when I visited the border in 1991.
39 Jane's Defence Weekly, October 19, 1991.
40 For an account of the 1991-92 Rohingya refugee crisis, see Burma in Revolt, pp. 397-8.
41 See also Jim Garamone, "Bin Laden and the Al-Qaeda Network," American Forces Press
Service, September 21, 2001: "Al-Qaeda has cells in Algeria, Egypt, Morocco, Turket, Jordan,
Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Syria, China, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Malaysia, Burma, Indonesia, the
Philippines, Lebanon, Iraq, Saudi-Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Yemen, Libya, Tunisia, Bosnia,
Kosovo, Chechnya, Dagestan, Sudan, Somalia, Kenya, Tanzania, Azerbaijan, Eritrea, Uganda,
Ethiopia, and in the West Bank and Gaza."
42 Jane's Intelligence Review, May 2002.
43 Subir Bhaumik, op. cit.
44 Transcript of John Walker interview, CNN, December 21, 2001.
45 Bertil Lintner, "A Recipe for Trouble," Far Eastern Economic Review, April 4, 2002. The
comment was made to the editor of the Far Eastern Economic Review, Michael Vatikiotis.
46 I visited the area, including Ukhia, in March 2002.
47 The figures are based on information from Bangladesh's Ministry of Planning. Bureau of
Statistics. See also Jaideep Saikia, Islamic Resurgence in Bangladesh, paper disseminated by
bangladesherdak@ yahoogroups. com in May 2002.
48 M.G. Kabir, op. cit., pp. 196-197.
49 Ibid., p. 199.
50 Ibid., p. 199.
51 Amnesty International, December 2001.
52 Ibid.
53 Ibid.
54 Human Rights Congress for Bangladesh Minorities, Give ransom or Girl, order hoodlums: 50
Christian families of Natoore subjugated by nightmare, December 8, 2001.
55 The Daily Janakantha (Bangladesh) , April 23, 2002.
56 Amnesty International, Press release ASA 13/005/2002, March 15, 2002.
57 News From Bangladesh, March 8, 2002. http://www/banglade shweb. com/news/mar/ 08/0803200 2 . htm
58 Muktadhara, "a website for Bengalis," http://members. tripod.com/ scohel/page03. html 59 The Eighth Parliamentary Elections 2001, p. 17.
60 The Hindu (India), April 2, 2002.
61 The Hindu (India), January 11, 2002.
62 A summary of Peters' talk was posted on the web (from bangladesherdak@ yahoogroups. com)
shortly after the event. I was the author of the articles in both the Wall Street Journal and the
Far Eastern Economic Review.
63 Interview with Enayetullah Khan, Dhaka, March 15, 2002.
www.asiapacificms. com
11
APPENDIX I
Main Islamist Groups in Bangladesh
Jamaat-e-Islami (JeI)
The JeI is a political party that dates back to the British colonial era, and the (East) Pakistan period (1947-1971). It supported Pakistan against the Bengali nationalists during the liberation war, and most of its leaders fled to (West) Pakistan after Bangladesh's independence in 1971. Its then amir (chief), Gholam Azam, fought against the freedom fighters in 1971, but returned to Bangladesh a few years later. In December 2000, Motiur Rahman Nizami, another former pro- Pakistani militant, took over as amir of the JeI. In the October 2001 election, the JeI emerged as the third largest party with 17 seats in Parliament and two ministers in the new coalition government.
The Jamaat's final aim is an Islamic state in Bangladesh, although this will be implemented step by step.
Islami Chhatra Shibir (ICS)
ICS is the youth wing of the JeI. Set up in 1941, it became a member of the International Islamic Federation of Student Organisations in 1979. The ICS is also a member of the World Assembly of Muslim Youth and has close contacts with other radical Muslim youth groups in Pakistan, the Middle East, Malaysia and Indonesia. One of its main strongholds in Bangladesh is at the university in Chittagong, and it dominates privately run madrassas all over the country. It has been involved in a number of bomb blasts and politically and religiously motivated assassinations.
Nurul Islam Bulbul is its current president and Muhammed Nazrul Islam is the secretary general.
Islami Oikyo Jote (IOJ)
A smaller Islamist party that joined the four-party alliance led by the Bangladesh Nationalist
Party (BNP), which won the October 2001 election. The IOJ secured two seats in Parliament, but
did not get any cabinet posts.
Harkat-ul-Jihad- al-Islami (HuJI)
The HuJI is Bangladesh's main militant organisation. Set up in 1992, it now has an estimated strength of 15,000 and is headed by Maulana Shawkat Osman alias Sheikh Farid in Chittagong. Its members are recruited mainly from students of the country's many madrassas, and until year 2001, they called themselves the `Bangladeshi Taliban'. The group is believed to have extensive contacts with Muslim organisations in the Indian States of West Bengal and Assam.
Azizul Huq, Chairman of the IOJ is a member of the HuJI's advisory council.
`The Jihad Movement'
Osama bin Laden's February 23, 1998, fatwah (religious ruling) urging Jehad against the United States was co-signed by two Egyptian clerics, one from Pakistan, and Fazlur Rahman, "leader of the Jihad Movement in Bangladesh". This is not believed to be a separate organisation but a common name for several Islamist groups in Bangladesh, of which HuJI is considered the biggest and most important.
Arakan Rohingya National Organisation (ARNO)
The ARNO is a political group among Rohingya migrants from Myanmar, who live in the Chittagong-Cox' s Bazaar area, and claim to be fighting for an autonomous Muslim region in Burma's Arakan (Rakhine) State. It was set up in 1998 through a merger of the Arakan Rohingya Islamic Front (ARIF) and the Rohingya Solidarity Organisation (RSO). Within months, however, the front fell apart. The leader of what remains of ARNO, Nurul Islam, is considered a moderate.He also led the ARIF before the merger in 1998.
Rohingya Solidarity Organisation (RSO)
Following the break-up of ARNO in 1999-2000, three new factions emerged, all of them re-claimingthe old name RSO. Traditionally, the RSO has been very close to Jamaat-e-Islami and Islami Chhatra Shibir in Chittagong and Cox's Bazaar. In the early 1990s, RSO had several military camps near the Burmese border, where cadres from the ICS were also trained in guerrilla warfare.
www.asiapacificms. com
12
APPENDIX 2
Harkat-ul-Jihad- Al-Islami/ Bangladesh
Central Executive Body
a) Maulana Najrul Islam, Amir
b) Mufti Maulana Safiur Rahman, Dy Amir
c) Mufti Abdul Hye
d) Mufti Manjurul Hossain
e) Maulana Niamatullah Farid
f Maulana Baqi Billah
g Maulana Sayeed Abu Taher
h) Maulana Samsuddin Kasimi
i) Maulana Abu Nasir
j) Maulana Fazlu Haq, Amini of Bangladesh Islamic Khelafat Andolan
k) Maulana Ataur Rahman Khan, Ex-MP of Kishoreganj
l) Abdul Zabbar of the Young Muslim League
m) Maulana Mohiuddin of the Islamic Morcha
Advisory Council
a) Maulana Mohiuddin Khan, Chief
b) Mufti Abdul Hye, Dy Chief, arrested by Bangladesh police on November 8, 1998
c) Maulana Manjur Ahmed, arrested by Bangladesh police on November 8, 1998
d) Maulana Fazlul Karim, Peer of Charmonai, chief of the Islamic Shasantantra. Andolan
e) Peer of Sharsina
f) Peer of Fultali, Sylhet
g) Mufti Shafi Ahmed, Hathazari madrassa, Chittagong
h) Mufti Taherullah, Patiya madrassa, Chittagong
i) Maulana Abdul Kalam Azad
j) Maulana Karnaluddin Zafri
k) Maulana Delawar Hossain Saidi
l) Maulana Obaidullah
m) Prof. Akhtar Farooq
n) Maulana Saikul Haddis Allama
o) Azizul Huq, Amir, Bangladesh Khilafat, Majlish and Chairman of the Islami Oikya Jote
p) Mohd. Abdus Mannan, principal Gauhardanga madrassa, Gopalganj, secretary general of the
Sarbodaya Olema Parishad
Khulna Branch
a) Mohd. Sirajul Haque, Amir
b) Mohd. Anisur Rahaman
c) Mohd. Sattaruddin Khan
d) Kasem Ali
Chittagong Branch
Office at Jameyat-ul-Ulurn madrassa, Lalkhanbazaar, Chittagong and Chief Maulavi is Maulana
Azharul Islam
a) Abdur Rouf, Amir
b) Mufti Shaiqur Rahman, Dy Amir
c) Abdul Baset
d) Abdul Khaled
e) Abu Tarek
f) Abdul Hakim
g) Amzad Belal
h) Obaidur Rahman Khan
i) Maulana Abdul Quddus
j) Maulana Mahbubul Alam, patron, based at 73, Kusumbagh, Dhoberpahar, near Chittagong
www.asiapacificms. com
13
Cox's Bazaar Branch
Maulana Salahul Islam, 36 yrs old, works for an NGO called AlHaramain (a Mecca-based organisation) in Cox's Bazaar. Graduated from of Riyadh University, reportedly close to the chief of the
Karachi branch of the Harkat-ul-Mujahidee n.
Sylhet Branch
a) Maulana Mohd. Abdul Karim, Patron, aka Sheikh-e-Kauria and president of the Sylhet branch of the Jamaat-e-Ulema- eIslam, Sylhet
b) Peer of Fultali, Fultali, Sylhet
c) Juned Ahmed, Biyani Bazaar, Sylhet
d) Abdul Matin, Biyani Bazaar, Sylhet
Jessore Branch
a) Maulana Manirul Islam Madani, patron, Viana, Jessore Katwali PS
b) Mufti Aminul Huq, imam of Railway Station madrassa, Jessore
c) Maulana Abdul Hassan Muhaddis (BA from Calcutta University and FAREK [similar to an MA
in religious studies] from Deoband madrassa, Sahranpur, UP, India. Presently employed as principal,
Qaumi madrassa, Jessore. Gen. Scy. of the Jessore branch of the Nizami-eIslami party in
the East Pakistan era.
d) Maulana Abdur Rouf, 50 yrs old, originally from Bongaon, West Bengal. Ex org. scy. of the
Nizami-e-Islami party in the East Pakistan era. Arrested in 1971 for his anti-Liberation movement
activities. Now a resident of Barandipara, Jessore.
e) Mufti Aminul Islam
f) Abdur Jabbar (retired DSP, Bangladesh Police)
g) D.K. Baksh (retired subedar major, Bangladesh Army)
Brahmanbaria Branch
a) Maulana Sirajul Islam, head, Zamia Yunnsia madrassa, Brahmanbaria
b) Abdul Karim, leader of the Taliban Mujahids, trained in Afghanistan. There are 15 Bangladeshi
Taliban Mujahids under his command, recruited from and based at Brahmanbaria
Comilla Branch
a) Imam of Ibne Tahmina High School, patron, Comilla
b) Mohd. Ali Akhtar, leader of Taliban Mujahids, Comilla. There are 15 Bangladeshi Taliban
MuJahids under his command, recruited from and based at Comilla
Training establishments
1. Mohiursunnals madrassa. Knila, Teknaf, Cox's Bazaar (near the Burmese border)
2. Hathazara madrassa, Chittagong Sadar
3. Patiya madrassa, Patiya, Chittagong Sadar
4. Jalpaitali and Tetultali, Bandarban District, Chittagong Hill Tracts
5. Maheshkhali and Garzania Hills in Nykhongchari PS, Bandarban District, Chittagong Hill Tracts
6. Raniping, Kazir Bazaar and Munshi Bazaar madrassas in Fultali PS, Sylhet District.
7. Baluchhera, Cox's Bazaar District (main camp)
8. Jameyat-ul-Ulum madrassa, Lalkhanbazaar, Chittagong
9. Brahmanbaria
10. Nayapara, Damudia Union, Teknaf, Cox's Bazaar District
11. Narichha Bazaar, Chittagong District
12. Rangamati Islamic Complex madrassa, Rangamati, Chittagong Hill Tracts
13. Mohmadpur Rahmiya Jamiatul madrassa, Dhaka
14. Lalmatia Kaumi madrassa, Dhaka
15. Malibagh Kaumi madrassa, Dhaka
16. Hajaripara Kaumi madrassa, Dhaka
17. Madani Kaumi madrassa, Dhaka
18. Farmgati Kaumi madrassa, Dhaka
19. Gazipur Bormi Kaumi madrassa
www.asiapacificms. com
14
Published Saturday, March 11, 2006 6:10 PM by sarbhadharme
http://hrcbmdfw. org/blogs/ bangladesh/ archive/2006/ 03/11/236. aspx
From: Dean Lawrence Subject: Re: Rohingya issue Date: Friday, April 10, 2009, 12:55 PM Dear Mr. Chan,
Many well respected historians had already rejected your claims as fraudulent. (သမိုင္းပညာရွင္ မည္သူျဖစ္သည္ကို မေျပာျပႏိုင္ပါ။)We are not here to make personal attacks (i.e. barking dogs , etc., as you mentioned) (ဆက္ဖတ္ပါ၊ ေျပာသလို မလုပ္တာ ကို သူ၏ေအာက္ပါ စာမ်ားတြင္ ဆက္လက္ ျမင္ရပါလိမ့္မည္) , but to point out that your claims are baseless. (သူက ေဒါက္တာ ဦးေအးခ်မ္း၏ စာမ်ားကို အေျခအျမစ္မရွိ ဟု စြပ္စြဲေသာ္လည္း အမွန္တကယ္ အခ်က္အလက္မ်ားျဖင့္ သက္ေသမျပႏိုင္သည္မ်ားကို ဆက္လက္ျမင္ရပါမည္။) I am not a historian (as I said before), but we compile the information gathered from various authentic sources, and we hand them over to U.S. and European government agencies as well as other NGO's. We read your papers written in your name and other names, and all has a common serious flaw (ေဒါက္တာ ဦးေအးခ်မ္း၏ စာမ်ားတြင္ အမွားပါသည္ ဆိုေသာ ယူဆခ်က္တစ္ခု ကို တင္ျပျပီး သက္ေသမျပႏိုင္ေပ။) - Rohingyas are illegal immigrants entered Burma during British colonial period and during Bangladesh independence war. This is a fundamental flaw in all of your papers which were written under different names. (ဘာေၾကာင့္မွားရသလဲ မေျပာျပႏိုင္ေသးပါ၊ မွားေနတယ္ မွားေနတယ္ လို ့သာ ေျပာေနပါတယ္။) You have no ground to challenge since you have confused Rohingyas with those FRC card-holding east Pakistanis(Chittago nians) during Mr. U Nu's administration. We will keep an eye on your pieces as you continue to portay Kanda as an evil institution in the name of academic platform. (ပုဂၢိဳလ္ေရး ကိုသာမက ၄င္းပုဂၢိဳလ္ အလုပ္လုပ္ကိုင္ေသာ စာေပရပ္၀န္း တစ္ခုကို ပါ ေပၚေပၚထင္ထင္ တိုက္ခိုက္လာတာ ျဖစ္ပါတယ္။)
Please communicate with us about Rohingyas and other persecuted minorities in Asia, if you know of any. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Lawrence Dean, Ph.D. AMC Groups International Washington, D.C.
On Thu, 4/9/09, Dean Lawrence wrote:
From: Dean Lawrence Subject: Re: Rohingya issue Date: Thursday, April 9, 2009, 1:33 PM
Dear Mr. Chan,
We were very pleased that you entered the debate a couple of weeks ago. Unfortunately, you seem to be backing out very quickly with the reason of wasting time. Promoting the cause of the nationalist Bhuddist Rakhine (ဘာသာေရး ကို အဘယ္ေၾကာင့္ ထည့္ေျပာရပါသနည္း၊) and the Burmese military junta has always been one of your top priorities. (စြပ္စြဲခ်က္မ်ား ထည့္သြင္းထားပါသည္၊) Won't it be of tremendous benefit to your group and the junta, if you continue to post pieces on junta-backed nationalist sites such as Narinjara.com and Rakhapura.com? (ဦးေလာရင့္မွာ အခ်က္အလက္မ်ား မွားေနသည္ကို ျပန္မဆန္းစစ္ မိေပ။ နရိန္စရာ သတင္း ဌာနမွာ စစ္အစိုးရႏွင့္ ပတ္သက္မွဳ မရွိရံု မက အတိုက္အခံ အင္အားစု ထဲမွ နာမည္ရ သတင္းဌာန တစ္ခု ျဖစ္ပါသည္။ နရိန္စရာ သတင္းဌာန နာမည္ရလာသည္မွာ လည္း သတင္းမ်ားကို အခ်ိန္ႏွင့္ တေျပးညီ ေဖာ္ျပႏိုင္ျခင္း၊ တစ္ျခားသတင္းဌာနမ်ား ထက္ ရခိုင္ေဒသ သတင္းမ်ားကို ပိုမို ေဖာ္ျပေပး ႏိုင္ျခင္း တို ့ေၾကာင့္ ျဖစ္ပါသည္။) Additionally, your falsification of history of Rakhine state and it's indigenous population in your various articles should also continue. (ယူဆခ်က္ တစ္ခုကို သက္ေသမျပႏိုင္လွ်င္ အမွန္အျဖစ္လက္မခံႏိုင္ ဟူေသာ ႏိုင္ငံတကာ စာေပ စည္းကမ္းတစ္ခု ကို ေဖာက္ဖ်က္ေနပါသည္။ ) The more you fabricate, the greater the attention that you will receive. We will not be surprised if some day you receive attention from Japanese authorities (including the board of trustees and administrators for your small college) about your aiding and abetting of ethnic cleansing by Burmese junta through your disinformation campaign using Kanda as a platform. (ေဒါက္တာ ဦးေအးခ်မ္းမွာ ကန္ဒ တကၠသိုလ္ တြင္ အလုပ္လုပ္ေသာ္လည္း သူ၏ စာေပမ်ားမွာ တစ္ဦးတည္း ကိုယ္ပိုင္ ရပ္တည္ခ်က္မ်ား ျဖစ္ပါသည္။) Let's hope that Kanda administrators are not summoned to the Hague for serving as an ethnic cleansing platform. (ဦးေလာရင့္မွာ ေဒါက္တာဦး ေအးခ်မ္းကို တိုက္ခိုက္ခ်င္ရံုမွ် မက သူအလုပ္လုပ္ေသာ ေနရာ ကိုပင္ ပ်က္စီးျခင္းသို ့ ေရာက္ေစခ်င္ေသာ မိစၦိရ စိတ္မ်ား လႊမ္းေနပါသည္။)
You said you have nothing to do with the postings in Narinjara and Rakhapura sites, and indicated to us to contact the editorial board. Then would you kindly give us the contact information on the so-called editorial board of these sites. We will appreciate it very much if you would assist us with the board members' names (excluding your aliases). (ဦးေလာရင့္မွာ တစ္ဖန္ထပ္မံ၌ အက်ိဳးမရွိေသာ စာမ်ားကို ဆက္လက္ေရးသားပါသည္။ အင္တာနက္ေခတ္တြင္ သိခ်င္လွ်င္ Google အကူအညီယူ၌ အလုပ္ျဖစ္ေနၾကသည္ ကို မသိမူ၌ ကေလးဆိုး တစ္ဦးကဲ့သို့ သူမ်ား အကူအညီကို ေတာင္းခံေနေလသည္။) We assure you that there will be nothing personal in this. Thank you again, and we hope to hear from you when you have a few minutes to write.
Sincerely, Lawrence Dean, Ph.D. AMC Groups International Washington, D.C.
On Tue, 4/7/09, Dean Lawrence
wrote: From: Dean Lawrence Subject: Re: Rohingya issue Date: Tuesday, April 7, 2009, 9:09 AM
Dear Mr. Chan: There is no need to be angry. Being a historian (as you claimed), you could be a little more diplomatic. "I don't care..." all these are kiddish expressions showing very little maturity. (ဤေရးသားခ်က္မွာ ပုဂၢိဳလ္ေရး တိုက္ခိုက္မွဳ သက္သက္သာ ျဖစ္ပါသည္။) I will not make much issue out of your old English name, Edward, as it is not the central point. I am glad that you took our traditional name. Just wondered being a nationalist, why would you choose such a nick name which has a Christian connotation. (ေရးစရာရွားလာ သျဖင့္ သူမ်ား၏ နာမည္ကို အေၾကာင္း ကို သာ ပုတ္ခတ္ေျပာဆိ ုလာပါသည္။ စာေပေရးရာ၊ သမိုင္းေရးရာ ႏွင့္ လံုးလံုးကင္းကြာလာပါသည္။ ) Since you are a nationalist Bhuddist, shouldn't you choose a Indian nickname such as Gautam, Agatha, etc. I assure you that these are not personal attacks. We are only searching for the logic. Whatever small thing one does, it will get attention. To be objective, of course, one can legitimately point out the character issue if an individual (from Japan or anywhere) is engaged in deceptive activities (personally or politically) . You asked me whether I am a white man or not. That is something that you should not worry. You folks in Burma are always engaged in black, white, Indian, or Chinese issue. One's appearance or gene pool should not matter. I may be a white or black or Latin; that is not an issue. What really matters is what we do, how we do things, and how we achieve our objectives in serving the most oppressed ethnic groups in the world (i.e., Darfur, Rohingyas, Karens, etc.). I assure you that you will not be wasting your time as we are not wasting our time. We may learn things from you that may have historical perspective (i.e. Chittagonians, Indians, Chinese in Burma during British time). You may also be educated about Rohingyas, Karens, etc., and the out-pouring of Christian West's support for them today. You may read/hear a lot in the world media, but there are much more behind the media coverage that we manage. Please continue to post in your various websites (Nirinjara, etc.). We all in the West would like to read and take notes. Thanks. (ဦးေလာရင့္မွာ အေနာက္တိုင္း ကို အထင္ၾကီးျပီး အေနာက္တိုင္းသည္ အေပၚက ေနေနျပီး ေစာင့္ၾကည့္ေနမည္ ဟူေသာ သေဘာျဖင့္ ဤစာကို ေရးဟန္တူပါသည္။ ခိုင္လံုေသာ သတင္းရပ္ကြက္ အရ ဦးေလာရင့္ ဆိုသူမွာ မူစလင္ အမ်ိဳးသား တစ္ဦးသာ ျဖစ္ျပီး အဂၤလိပ္စာ ကို ေကာင္းေကာင္းေရးသား ႏိုင္သူ တစ္ဦးသာ ျဖစ္ပါသည္။)
Sincerely, Lawrence Dean, Ph. D. AMC Groups International Washington, D.C.
>>> From: Dean Lawrence >>> Subject: Re: Rohingya issue >>> To: "Edward Chan" >>> Date: Monday, April 6, 2009, 6:25 PM
>>> Dear Mr. Aye Chan: >>> >>> We really do not believe that you have been out of the debate as you > are >>> claiming. You have been in the debate using different names. We went >>> through >>> several of your pieces (and emails) where you used various names from > the >>> different countries. It is very ironic that being a Rakhine > nationalist >>> who >>> is so much concerned about the cultural and religious identity, you >>> quickly >>> adopted an old English name (Edward) which basically is a name of our >>> Christian heritage. How do you feel to be Edward; does it feel like >>> slightly >>> elevated? (ဦးေလာရင့္မွာ ေဒါက္တာ ဦးေအးခ်မ္း၏ နာမည္ခံယူခ်က္ ကို သာ တိုက္ခိုက္ေနပါသည္။ သမိုင္းေၾကာင္းေရးရာ ေဆြးေႏြးႏိုင္ျခင္းမရွိပါ။ ၄င္းအျပင္ ဤေနရာတြင္ မစၥတာ ေလာရင့္၏ အေနာက္တိုင္းကို အထင္ၾကီးမွဳ မည္မွ် ၾကီးမားသည္ကို ျမင္ႏိုင္ပါသည္။ ) Secondly, the attachment of your historical accounts in your >>> email >>> is just a series of numbers. How careless you can be! Is that how you >>> read >>> and interpret the history as well? You are claiming that you are a >>> historian, and you are asking me whether I am of the same kind. Nope! >>> History was not my specialty in graduate study; it was International >>> Ralations specializing in east European bloc during cold war. However, >>> our >>> focus is >>> different now. Our groups work very closely with many talented > scholars >>> who >>> are quite knowledgeable about world's oppressed minorities. We > acquire >>> our >>> information mainly from them. One thing these scholars do not indulge > in >>> is >>> fabricating the history, as you do. You fabricate and twist history, > and >>> your dishonesty and deception is evident pretty much everywhere in > your >>> pieces. (မိမိစြပ္စြဲျပီး သကာလ စြပ္စြဲခ်က္ မွန္ကန္ေၾကာင္း သက္ေသ မျပႏိုင္ျပန္ပါ။)You are truly abusing the academic freedom by being the >>> spokesperson >>> of the Burmese Military Junta from a stage in Japan. (စြပ္စြဲခ်က္ သက္သက္ျဖင့္ စာမ်ားေရးသား ေနပါသည္။ အမွန္တကယ္ စာေပတတ္ေျမာက္ေနလွ်င္ သက္ေသျပခ်က္၊ အကိုးအကား ခိုင္ခိုင္လံုလံုျဖင့္ ေရးသား သင့္ပါသည္။) Now let's get > to the >>> point: Rohingya. >>> >>> You must have been confused tremendously or it is just a deception > from >>> your >>> part. However, your account of Chittagonian Bengalis coming to Burma >>> during >>> and after British rule is correct; and that was for business reason. > Many >>> British historian/writers had indicated that in their publications. > They >>> came and settled in many cities in Burma, and did business as the > Indians >>> (i.e. Surathis, Tamilians, etc.) and even Pakistanis (Patan). They did >>> very >>> well in free market economy until General Ne Win nationalized the >>> industries >>> and businesses. Even during that time (and after) there was a > Pakistani >>> diplomatic mission (later, Bangladeshi mission) in the city of Sittwe >>> (then >>> known as Akyab) to serve the FRC (Foreigner Registration Card)-holding >>> Pakistanis/Bengalis . They were not servicing the native-Rohingyas who >>> were >>> holding NRC (National Registration Card). You have knowlingly or >>> unknowingly >>> mixed these two; the native-Rohingya community and Chittagonian >>> Bengali business community. (မူစလင္ အုပ္စုမ်ားကို အမ်ိဳးမ်ိဳးေသာ ယူဆခ်က္မ်ားျဖင့္ အုပ္စုခြဲ ေနပါသည္။ လူမ်ိဳးခြဲျခား အုပ္ခ်ဳပ္တတ္ေသာ ျဗိတိသွ်မ်ားပင္လွ်င္ ဤမွ်ခြဲျခား ႏိုင္ခဲ့ျခင္း မရွိခဲ့ပါ။ မူစလင္မ်ားမွာ သူမ်ားႏိုင္ငံကို စိုးမိုးလို၍ မိမိအမ်ိဳးသား မ်ားကို ပင္ ခြဲျခားေသာ စိတ္ျဖင့္ ဆက္ဆံေနၾကသည္မွာ အံၾသစရာ ေကာင္းလွပါသည္။) You are correct that Chittagonians in > Arakan >>> was mentioned in the history book; they were explicitly talking about >>> FRC-holding Chittagonian Bengalis, not Rohingyas. Although an >>> overwhelming >>> majority of Bengalis (and Indians and Pakistani Patans, for that > matter) >>> left Burma after Ne Win's revolution, still many stayed behind. > Even >>> today >>> you will see Bengali mosque, Surathi mosque, etc. in Rangoon. These > are >>> evidence of Bengali and Indian population in Burma, and Rohingyas are > 300 >>> miles northwest in their native land, northern Arakan. These facts of >>> apples >>> and oranges shouldn't be confusing to anyone. >>> >>> Now let's take a look at relationship between Bengalis and > Rohingyas. Are >>> they similar? Yes. Are they culturally tied? Absolutely? (အခုေတာ့ အတူတူျဖစ္ေၾကာင္း ကို ၀န္ခံျပီး ျဖစ္ေနပါသည္။ မိမိၾကိဳးျဖင့္ မိမိကို ပတ္မိေလျပီတကား။) Let's > look at >>> another analogy. The Rakhines (also known as Maghs) and the Buremse > (the >>> ruling junta's race). Are they similar? Yes. Are they culturally > tied? >>> Absolutely? Their languages? Almost the same (experts say only slight >>> difference is the pronunciation of certain words). We need to dig a >>> little >>> more about the origin of Maghs as we do not know much about their > origin >>> at >>> this point. Because of the similarities, it is likely that Arakanese > are >>> descendants of Burmese. Is Arakanese a manufactured word? May be. >>> Regardless, they are recognized as ethnic group (it shouldn't have > been >>> since they are almost identical to Burmese). (ျမန္မာ ႏိုင္ငံ လြတ္လပ္ေရး ရျပီးစခါက ရခိုင္ႏွင့္မြန္ကို ဗမာတိုင္းရင္းသား အုပ္စုထဲတြင္ ထည့္ခဲ့ပါသည္။ ဤသည္ကို ဦးေလာရင့္ မသိပါ။ ေနာက္ပိုင္းတြင္မွာ ရခိုင္ႏွင့္မြန္သည္ သမိုင္း အေထာက္အထား ခိုင္ခိုင္လံုလံုျဖင့္ မိမိ၏ အိုင္ဒန္တီတီ ကို ခြဲျခားယူခဲ့ၾကျခင္း ျဖစ္ပါသည္။ ဦးေလာရင့္ ကား သမိုင္းေလ့လာမွဳ အားနည္းေပစြ။) It makes sense that > Rohingya >>> word may have been manufactured similarly, but IT WAS MANY CENTURIES > AGO. (သက္ေသ အေထာက္အထား ခိုင္ခိုင္လံုလံု ျပပါ၊ ဦးေလာရင့္။ သာမန္ျငင္းခံုရံုျဖင့္ ျပီးေသာ ကိစၥ မဟုတ္ပါ။) >>> That is the main point that you will never be able to digest because > of >>> so >>> much abomination for >>> another human race filled in your heart and soul. >>> >>> Let's look at current situation about Rohingyas. The international >>> community >>> has recognized the ethnic name of Rohingya. (သတင္းဌာနမ်ားက ရိုဟင္ဂ်ာဟု မိမိကိုယ္မိမိ ေခၚသူေတြ ဒုကၡေရာက္ ဆင္းရဲေနသည္ ဟုသာ သိပါသည္။ သမိုင္းေၾကာင္း ဆိုင္ရာကို သတင္းဌာနမ်ား လိုအပ္ပါက စံုစမ္းလာၾကပါလိမ့္မည္။) This is significant > because >>> very >>> little was known about them in the past. The Rohingya issue has become > a >>> major factor in how the West supports the Burma pro-democracy > movements >>> (the >>> real groups or junta-backed groups). The Rohingya issue has gained so >>> much >>> momentum worldwide (even in Japan) now that it is virtually > unstoppable. . >>> You have a very difficult time ahead! (ဦးေလာရင့္မွာ ျခိမ္းေျခာက္ေသာ အလုပ္ကို သာ လုပ္တတ္ပါသည္။ သမိုင္းဆိုင္ရာ ေဆြးေႏြးျခင္း၊ သက္ေသျပျခင္း၊ အခ်က္အလက္အမွန္ ရွာေဖြျခင္း မရွိသျဖင့္ သမိုင္းဆရာတစ္ဦးျဖစ္ေသာ ေဒါက္တာ ဦးေအးခ်မ္း ႏွင့္ ေဆြးေႏြး ႏိုင္္ေသာ စာေပတတ္ေျမာက္မွဳ မရွိေၾကာင္း ထင္ရွားလာပါသည္။) >>> >>> Sincerely, >>> >>> Lawrence Dean, Ph.D. >>> AMC Groups International >>> Washington, D.C.
>>> From: Dean Lawrence >>> Subject: Rohingya issue >>> To: khin.maung.saw@ googlemail. com >>> Cc: "Aye Chan" >>> Date: Friday, April 3, 2009, 11:28 AM
>>> Dear Mr. Saw, Maung, and Htwe, >>> >>> Your lengthy reply is even more interesting than the previous > postings.. >>> Does it really matter who we are, or does it matter what we write and > how >>> we >>> function as advocacy groups? It sure does matter. >>> >>> Your paranoia about Rohingya was consistently expressed in all the > pieces >>> you wrote. Your message is loud and clear - the Rohingyas are > Bengalis >>> and >>> they are going to eat the Rakhines alive! Let's assume for > minute that >>> the >>> Rohingyas are Bengalis. That means the Rakhines are truly sandwiched >>> between >>> Burmese (the ruling junta's race) and the Bengalis. One of them is > going >>> to >>> eat the Rakhines alive within one or two generations. What are your >>> options? >>> >>> Your paranoia is so intense that no one in the western civilization > can >>> convince you (the Rakhines) regardless of how the history has > unfolded >>> over >>> the centuries. You do not seem to understand that human race or > ethnicity >>> do >>> not stop with man-made border demarcation. These artificial borders > are >>> drawn out by colonial British, and the native land of the ill-fated >>> Rohingyas in northern Rakhine fell in the Burma side. This is also >>> true in >>> other sides of Burma with Nagas and the tribes in Shan state, to > mention >>> just a couple. Burmese military has not much concern over those tribes >>> as they are not perceived to be a threat. >>> >>> You are absolutely correct that many Bengalis are also on the refugee >>> boat >>> along with Rohingyas, and the Indonesian authorities have already >>> identified >>> them. There are many cultural similarities between Rohingyas and >>> Bengalis, >>> therefore, it is nut an issue for them for them to sail together for > the >>> same destination. Now Bangladesh government is taking the Bengalis > back, >>> and >>> Burmese junta is willing to take the Rohingyas back if they are > declared >>> as >>> Bengalis. Does it make sense? Why should the Burmese junta accept > the >>> so-called Bengalis to settle in Burma. The reason is obvious - the > junta >>> knows well that these Rohingyas are truly the native of northern > Rakhine. >>> The ASEAN leaders and the western civilization recognize that it is >>> positive >>> step, but the junta can never be trusted. >>> >>> No matter how harshly your group and some pro-democracy movement > condemn >>> Burmese military junta, the international community has a reason to > think >>> that your accusations are rife with dishonesty and deceptions. In > fact, >>> many >>> analysts in NGOs and U.S. governments suspect that at least some of > these >>> pro-democracy movements are double-crossing and working closely with > the >>> ruling Burmese military junta. >>> >>> We will watch and note what develops next. >>> >>> Sincerely, >>> >>> Lawrence Dean, Ph.D. >>> AMC Groups International >>> Washington, D.C.
